POLITICIAN’S CORRECT – The Age Of Entitlement Is Over

Pensioner

I absolutely agree, if a pension isn’t an entitlement, neither is theirs.  They keep telling us that paying us an aged pension isn’t sustainable.

Paying politicians all the perks they get is even less sustainable!  

The politicians themselves, in Canberra, brought it up, that the Age of Entitlements is over.

The author is asking each addressee to forward this post to a minimum of twenty people on their address list; in turn ask each of those to do likewise.  In three days, most people in Australia will have this message.  This is one idea that really should be passed around because the rot has to stop somewhere.

Proposals to make politicians shoulder their share of the weight now that the Age of Entitlement is over:

  1. Scrap political pensions. Politicians can purchase their own retirement plan, just as most other working Australians are expected to do. 
  1. Retired politicians (past, present & future) participate in Centrelink. A Politician collects a substantial salary while in office but should receive no salary when they’re out of office.Terminated politicians under 70 can go get a job or apply for Centrelink unemployment benefits like ordinary Australians.Terminated politicians under 70 can negotiate with Centrelink like the rest of the Australian people. 
  1. Funds already allocated to the Politicians’ retirement fund be returned immediately to Consolidated Revenue.This money is to be used to pay down debt they created which they expect us and our grandchildren to repay for them. 
  1. Politicians will no longer vote themselves a pay raise. Politicians pay will rise by the lower of, either the CPI or 3%. 
  1. Politicians lose their privileged health care system and participate in the same health care system as ordinary Australian people. i.e. Politicians either pay for private cover from their own funds or accept ordinary Medicare. 
  1. Politicians must equally abide by all laws they impose on the Australian people. 
  1. All contracts with past and present Politicians men/women are void effective 31/12/14.

PoliticianThe Australian people did not agree to provide perks to Politicians, that burden was thrust upon them.

Politicians devised all these contracts to benefit themselves.

Serving in Parliament is an honour not a career.

The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, so our politicians should serve their term(s), then go home and back to work.

If each person contacts a minimum of twenty people, then it will only take three or so days for most Australians to receive the message.  Don’t you think it’s time?

 

THIS IS HOW YOU FIX Parliament and help bring fairness back into this country!

If you wonder why the above individuals are asking for your help look at the figures below.

Total Remuneration for office Effect 1 July 2014 (per annum) 

  • Chief of the Defence Force > $535,100 – $764,420
  • Commissioner of Taxation > $518,000 – $740,000
  • Chief Executive Officer, Australian Customs and Border Protection Service > $483,840 – $691,200
  • Auditor-General for Australia > $469,150 – $670,210
  • Australian Statistician > $469,150 – $670,210

 Salaries of retired Prime Minister and Politicians  Office Additional salary (%)  Salary as of 1 July

abbott 1

Tony Abbott

Prime Minister 160% – $507,338

Deputy Prime Minister 105% $400,016

Treasurer 87.5%  $365,868

Leader of the Opposition 85.0%  $360,990

House of Reps Speaker 75.0%  $341,477

Leader of the House 75.0%  $341,477

Minister in Cabinet 72.5%  $336,599

Parliamentary secretary 25.0%  $243,912

Other ministers 57.5%  $307,329

Shadow minister 25.0%  $243,912

 

Bill Shorten

Bill Shorten

Federal Politicians ONLY  TOTAL ANNUAL SALARIES (for 150 seats) =  $41,694,311 Million – PER  YEAR and does not include their expense accounts and perks on the top.

 Conclusions:

TOTAL ‘life time’ (20 year) payments, (excluding wages paid while in parliament) = A$833,886,220 – OVER $833 MILLION

Julia Gillard

Julia Gillard

Julia Gillard, Kevin Rudd, John Howard, Paul Keating, Malcolm Fraser, Bob Hawke, et al, add nauseum, are receiving $10 MILLION + EXTRA at taxpayer expense.

Should an elected PM serve 4 years and then decide to retire, each year (of the 4 years) will have cost taxpayers an EXTRA Two and a half million bucks a year!  A$2,536,690 to be precise.

A 2 year retirement payment cut-off will SAVE our Oz bottom line A$792,201,909 *** NEARLY $800 MILLION.

There are 150 seats in House, minus the 8 above = 142 seats, divided equally for example = 71 each for both shadow and elected ministers.

This example excludes all wages paid while a parliamentarian AND all perks on top of that – travel, hotels, Secretarial staff, speech writers, restaurants, offices, chauffeured limos, security, etc.  etc.

150 seats, 20-year payment of A$833,886,220 MILLION less annual salary x 2 years of A$83,388,622.  [$41,694,311 x 2]

“Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be better to change the locks.” (Doug Larson – English middle-distance runner who won gold medals at the 1924 Olympic Games in Paris, 1902-1981)

YOU’RE RIGHT, YOU HAVE FOUND WHERE THE CUTS SHOULD BE MADE!

ACTION: Push for a MAX 2 year post retirement payment (give ‘em time to get a real job).

Spread it far and wide folks.  People should know.

 Dr.  Dale Kerwin
School of Education
MT Gravatt Campus Grifffith University
(07) 3735 5884 – fax. (07) 3735 5991
email: d.kerwin@griffith.edu.au

Advertisements

PC Security Your Personal Gatekeeper Package

gatekeeper pc logo

After much work we have now a security package available to secure you Personal Computer / Laptop (PC), your emails, your thumb-drives, and storing passwords.

The package contains five (5) programs and a detailed easy to follow manual showing you how to use the software , some modified, we use and have tested extensively  offering you great security for documents, folders while keeping prying eyes locked out of your personal information.

The publicity from Wikileaks and Edward Snowden uncovering and exposing government invading your privacy joining internet crooks  seeking information to run their scams.

Just $25.00 for the package to help keep this website going and keeping your family and/or business PC safe and secure.

Secure payment can be made below by PayPal and when confirmed a download link will be emailed to you direct.

We thank you for your support

Chinese Government Harvest Political Prisoners Organs To Sell For Transplants

“A society whose citizens refuse to see and investigate the facts, who refuse to believe that their government and their media will routinely lie to them and fabricate a reality contrary to verifiable facts, is a society that CHOOSES and DESERVES the police state dictatorship it is going to get” – Ian William Goddard

DAVIDS AND GOLIATH

A new film exposing Chinese Communist forced organ-harvesting of political prisoners.

chinese-organ-harvest

Video Link: http://www.viewster.com/movie/1286-18885-000/davids-and-goliath/

This is the film that most Australian politicians and the Australian media, starry-eyed with Chinese free-trade deals, don’t want you to see.  The film studies the process over many years by which David Matas, internationally famous Canadian Human Rights lawyer and David Kilgour, former Canadian Secretary of State for South East Asia, exposed the organ harvesting in China from executed falun gong practitioners and other prisoners of conscience.  About 15 years ago China began to rival the USA as the country where most organ transplants were being carried out , yet they had virtually no organ donor system.

From where were they getting the organs if there were no donor system?  Eventually they admitted they were coming from executed prisoners.  But officially only about 3000 prisoners were being executed every year, (though even this, of course, made China the biggest executioner of people in the world).

To supply the approximately 10,000 transplants every year, due to compatibilty, suitability criteria , etc, you would need 100,000 executed prisoners.  Obviously the number of executions was being covered up.  It was then established that imprisoned falun gong practitioners, and it is noticeable that the banning of the falun gong movement coincided with the sudden increase in transplant activity, were the main source for the organs.

This film has actual interviews with nurses and doctors who took part in organ removal from imprisoned falun gong practitioners.

Phone conversations when mandarin-speaking Chinese Canadians were employed to phone up hospitals in China to inquire if they could get transplants, and if they had falun gong prisoners to use for the source as they knew “they were good”, are documented and shown.  Obviously, in practice many prison inmates have drug, alcohol and hepatitis contamination so cannot be used for organ harvesting, which is why falun gong prisoners, who were always healthy and drug free, were preferred.  With the price of organs every dead falun gong practitioner or other forced donor could be theoretically worth about $1,000,000 for their organs.  The organ harvesting had become a money making racket for the Chinese Communist Party.

In this film nurses and doctors relate how the saw organs cut out of prisoners, even while they were still alive, and then when all the useful organs were taken, if still alive they were killed by throwing them into incinerators to destroy the evidence.

Former prisoners relate how falun gong practitioners were singled out for blood tests and health checks, obviously not for their welfare, as they were continually being tortured to make them renounce their practice and make forced confessions, but to keep track of their suitability for organ harvesting.

It is estimated 40,000 to 60,000 falun gong practitioners , Uyghurs, Christians and other dissidents or “prisoners of conscience” have been killed for their organs in China and while Chinese communist flags deck the approaches to Parliament House in Canberra, this obscene criminal enterprise is still going on.

Wherever David Matas and David Kilgour go to inform people about these atrocities the Chinese Government pressures local MPs and institutions not to meet with them.
Watch this 66 minute film, DAVIDS AND GOLIATH, that has just been released available online until November 27.

http://www.viewster.com/movie/1286-18885-000/davids-and-goliath/

BOB VINNICOMBE

NOTE: SOS-NEWS has recorded this video and will have a link in place after November 27th 2014

Russia Ukraine & the Rest

USA war machineIf ever there was proof just how western neo-cons and war mongers of the USA push for change in the governments of sovereign countries; this story tells it and tells who is at the top of the pile.

History may well hold President Obama high in esteem for his ability to stand against those in the political and military power of the USA; those who see the need to wage war where perhaps they should never be.

  • Regime change in Syria would see Russia’s small Mediterranean naval base gone.
  • Regime change in Ukraine would see the huge Russian Sebastopol naval base in Crimea gone.
  • Denigration and blustering against Iran sees another Russian friend put under pressure and assuredly regime change there is a USA goal for the same reasons.

As Europe – hence the European Union – has expanded and the USSR – now just Russia – has been decimated geopolitically & Geographically, NATO has never let up on the pressures being applied to remaining Soviet borders.  This may be a good thing in some minds, but at some time there comes a need to call enough as being enough.

eu_countries_europeThere can be little doubt of a need for Russia to remain a strong independent nation.  It is a nation rich in minerals, precious metals along with energy such as gas and oil. Europe relies on these natural commodities and in winter, not only would Europe suffer, but many, many citizens of the myriad of countries who rely on such energy for heating etc.; would die.

While the world demonises President Putin and his nation over Ukraine and perhaps culpably & falsely so over the downing of MH17; the USA is shown to have a grubby hand; yet people in general – busy with their daily lives – don’t seem to have the time to see it that way.

Continue reading

BOTH SIDES OF PIG TROUGH DOING WELL AT PUBLIC EXPENSE!

Politicians and their obscenely excessive perquisites (perks)

by Renny Carter

Renny Carter

Renny Carter 53, is an old journo and one of the Liberal Party’s faceless men, who has opinions on anything in Contemporary life.

DON’T SHOOT JOE HOCKEY

The poor bastard has inherited a mess of unprecedented proportions that is going to take a long Liberal tenure to sort out and return to some normality – if at all.

The sad reality is that Australia is made up of three types of people. Workers, bludgers and pensioners. And is desperately trying to claw every dollar they can back from this hurting system…the magnifying glass has momentarily paused above the latter category. Which is sad. We expect the pensioners to be looked after in this country. We don’t want to see elderly people homeless and destitute in Australia. And unlike Italy and Japan – we don’t have a culture of always looking after our senior citizens.

Gagging politicians perks

Pollies silent on perks

I have an immediate idea that could claw back quite a few millions. Means test the (expletive deleted) politicians for a start! Let’s take a few luminaries who really don’t deserve the largesse we give them.

The wastage in this area alone is horrendous and is a massive burden on the taxpayer. Moreover, is it justified? Do we get any value for money? The latest revelation that both Rudd and Gillard get a $200,000 salary for the rest of their natural lives plus enormous travel allowances, office accommodation and staffing costs is an insult given that neither was poor to start with and both now have ‘jobs’. They are young enough to work. Younger than me! If I have to keep working until I am 70 plus, why don’t they?

A study in 2010 by the Daily Telegraph revealed that Mr Rudd, at 52, a young ex-prime minister, will receive well in excess of $20 million worth of allowances if he lives to 85. This is despite the fact he had served just 2 1/2 years as P.M. at that point. This of course has altered even more dramatically with his additional tenure.

Once retired, he is entitled to his own office, worth about $120,000 a year in Brisbane for the rest of his life and four staff, which political insiders say will cost $240,000 a year. What? The Rudd’s new multi-million home doesn’t have room for a home office?

Mr Rudd would also be entitled to the lease of a car worth up to $55,000 for the rest of his life. Leasing experts say this would be worth $1000 to 1500 a month. And Mr Rudd will receive all of these benefits on top of his wife’s estimated $210 million fortune!

Surely this good luck is the result of considerable ‘Government’ work being put her way and rules them out of any more wanton generosity from the Australian people.

Add to this, Gillard. This former communist who has now embraced the capitalist ideal with both arms and not a whimper of complaint I notice. She has already ditched the brick veneer in Altona for a swanky pool-side ponderosa in leafy Adelaide no doubt made possible by a $500,000 salary and ongoing perks.

My point is this. I have had to make cuts to my life because things change. The expensive office I used to lease in Melbourne is gone because, with the Internet I can now work from home. I now use consultants rather than employ up to 10 people which today would send me broke. I now drive a Ute because it is cheaper to register and insure. Cost cutting measures made to ensure I can continue to work in a country that is very much prejudiced against senior aged workers.

Mrs Renny is not happy. I have taken over a picturesque corner of our winter lounge room and in her words – I am a messer! When the drawing board comes out, which it does at least once a month, the kitchen table is also rendered unserviceable. Not to mention several square yards around it.

Why is it then that we continue to provide multiple millions to give these buggers swanky offices to run their now quite irrelevant lives from? I mean what has Hawke’s or Keating’s offices churned out in the past few years that justifies these silly extravagances? Books about them? Utterances from them? Both could be made from their kitchen tables surely! Does an Ex-PM really need an office that costs up to $14,000 a month? They have large homes with room for an office. None lives in a ‘bed-sit’. None even knows what a ‘bed-sit’ is! Maybe they should become pensioners and find out.

Just so I am being even handed here – according to the 2010 figures Keating was in fact the most frugal as he keeps staffing costs low by engaging people on a part-time and ad hoc basis.

Each former PM is entitled to at least two staff, including a senior private secretary, and the annual wages bill of each is nearly $300,000. Mr Keating saves about $70,000 a year by using staff as he needs them instead of full time appointees.

However, new figures have come to light revealing that in the seven months after leaving office, Mr Howard spent $109,892 on limousine services, evenly split between the government Comcar service and private hire cars. Mr Howard’s office rental was the highest at $13,853 a month, closely followed by former PM Malcolm Fraser, whose 101 Collins St office in Melbourne costs taxpayers $12,122 a month.

Former Labor PMs Whitlam and Hawke have offices on adjacent floors in Sydney’s Potts Point at 100 William St The monthly cost for each is $7464 and $7898 respectively. Mr Keating’s office is also in Potts Point, in Manning St, and costs slightly less at $7434 a month.

The former PMs also have their home and mobile phone bills paid by taxpayers, as well as unlimited allowances for publications, a private self-drive car, and air fares for them and their spouse. (Which really irks in the case of Therese Rein who has $210 million in the bank.

These are in addition to their pensions under the generous former Parliamentary superannuation scheme, which gives them a pension INDEXED TO CURRENT MPs’

SALARIES FOR LIFE!

The payout they receive depends on their length of service in Parliament, which is accelerated in the case of prime ministers and their final salary.

Each PM can usually expect to receive about 70 per cent of the incumbent’s salary, unless they chose to take a lump sum on retirement. (I thank the Daily Telegraph for doing the hard yards here with the figures and info.)

I have nothing against paying our PM a wage that reflects the importance of their job, but I have lots against them making millions from us when they a) don’t really need it and b) don’t really deserve it anymore.

But now, the ones facing the fiscal axe, are the poor pensioners who have worked and paid tax all their lives! As for the bludgers.. well that’s a whole separate issue.

THIS STORY MERITS AN APPEARANCE ON THE FRONT PAGE OF EVERY AUSTRALIAN NEWSPAPER – OF COURSE THAT WON’T HAPPEN, SO LET’S CIRCULATE IT FAR AND WIDE BY EMAIL

Ukrainian Separatists & Russia Tried & Convicted by a Kangaroo Court

Controlling Public Opinion

Controlling Public Opinion

With the Ukrainian Separatist Rebels claiming they did not have a BUK system and their leader claiming he did not  give any orders to shoot down MH17, let alone have the ability to do so; the media does not give up on apportioning blame towards Russia and the Ukrainian Separatists.

Who knows at present; maybe they did, maybe they did not, so let’s put aside the past and just consider the present outside the fog of misinformation.

As the International team make numerous attempts to gain safe access to the crash site and assess the wreckage as best as able and thereby also attempt to recover whatever missing bodies they can find; there comes a need to consider the obstacle and what the obstacle indicates.

The Ukrainian western concocted government – with Yatsenuk now resigning – seems somewhat in disarray; a situation one would have considered most unlikely given the amount of western overt support they seemed to have garnered since the crash.

Yet it is the Ukrainian forces pushing the civil war to a point where the International teams are no longer safe to get entry to the downed aircraft’s site.  If Ukraine were serious about seeing all the bellicose rhetoric they have spewed in the direction of the Ukrainian Separatist’s – rhetoric they espouse as facts re the downing of MH17 – then their current actions perhaps speak volumes about their real intentions whilst hidden behind the fog.

All it would require to satisfy International desires is for the Ukrainian Government forces to have halted their military where they were for the duration – ceased their continuing bullet firing military push – and let the inquiry teams in to do their work matter solved.  The Ukrainian Separatists are not against letting the teams in and onsite; they are against allowing spies and enemy advances to gain a military advantage through the processes; an advantage which may well give their enemy an additional foot hold against them; almost just as has happened.

It is quite clear to any lateral thinking person; the Ukrainian forces are equally if not more so the ones ensuring the evidence as is left, deteriorates to such a point little forensic evidence of real good is able to be located.  Why?

thinking pic re revolutionBecause it is just as reasonable to suspect a unit of the Ukrainian Government forces were the ones who fired off the missile/s. Even USA’s own Intelligence appears to lend some credence to this consideration; albeit, the subsequent spin to defuse this evidence was as swift as it was laughable.  A spin which grows by the day with all sorts of intelligence claims, yet with little if any evidence of substance and credibility being made available.

As the evidence may well point at the Ukrainian forces as much as the Ukrainian Separatists being the shooters of MH17; there comes perhaps a need to ensure little, if any real evidence remains and time here is the ally to this goal.

The public opinion against the Ukrainian Separatists is such that if the Ukrainian Military can forestall the investigation and hence degrade the evidence beyond useless, that media contrived public opinion may well be the driving force giving what skimpy and perhaps contrived evidence being left, any credibility in people’s minds; and that opinion at this point has been carefully massaged to be all against the rebels, Putin and Russia.

Mainstream media cannot help themselves making statements which apportion dedicated blame; yet the evidence – real indisputable evidence – to support those statements does not exist; not yet.

It is noticeable the envoys and government spokespeople of all nations except the USA are very careful in their choice of words when publicly speaking of the downing.  Yet the media are not so circumspect and go so far as to constantly barrage the wider western world’s public with language which should really frighten us all.  The media have become a Kangaroo Court; bestowing upon themselves the office of judge, jury and executioner of the Ukrainian Separatists, President Putin and Russia combined.

Why ever would the world beyond the western powers ever believe in the democracy the west so vehemently tries to foist upon those not so governed; when all they see is deceit and bullying through power and might, whilst allowing the most powerful tool of all; the misuse of a biased western mainstream media to indoctrinate the wider globe’s western public.

Worldwar3In the modern world of the Internet; western law tries to recognise: should information published affect the outcome of a trial, or defame an individual or an entity – regardless of borders – then that publishing may be held legally responsible and accountable.  Who is going to take to task and hold a wild and out of control media responsible and accountable for such transgressions; transgressions which could indirectly lead to wider local, or global conflict?

Has the sad downing of MH17 just become a tool for western politics and a US led NATO push against an old foe – Russia with a wider view of encircling China?

 

Brumbyy With 2Ys

 

NATO push vs MH17 Passenger’s Justice

missileIt just doesn’t stop.  The main stream western media are so in bed with the propaganda being hurled out, that there is little chance of President Putin ever being allowed any credibility.

There are a number of facts which we all need to consider when each of us individually decides for ourselves  what is and what is not the truth about the downing of MH17 and the death of 298 souls believed as a result of a Russian made BUK ground to air missile system; known to the West as an SA-11. There are numerous versions of the BUK as it has evolved over the years.

  1. Russian military hardware is essentially the only weaponry hardware that fills the arsenal of both the Separatists and the Ukraine military.

Russia has been the main supplier of military hardware to Ukraine for many years and the training of this Russian made weaponry has of course been by Russian experts. In today’s war; the supply of weaponry to Ukraine is not all that clear. It is also not clear at all whether the Ukraine Separatists actually had access to a latest SA-11 missile battery; but it is a fact that the Ukrainian Army does have such in its arsenal.  Furthermore, it is reported the Ukrainian Army has deployed this weaponry into the Eastern Ukrainian battle ground.

  1. The Separatists may have appeared to some to be nonchalant about the bodies of the downed MH17 passengers; but when they had secured body bags the remains of the dead were efficiently  picked up.

The bodies of the lost souls from MH17 were strewn across the crash site and almost immediately the Separatists were instrumental in marking out the position of any bodies and parts found; just as would happen anywhere else there may occur such a tragedy.  With the obvious lack of body bags available to such a make shift army; it wasn’t until these bags materialised the movement of the deceased commenced from where they lay.  It was clear though; as soon as those bags arrived, this is exactly what occurred.  It was also clear those bags once filled with a deceased’s remains, they were being transported and carried as respectfully as possible under the circumstances.  The placing of the bodies alongside the road was purely an interim action and at no time was there any disrespect shown in the video footage spread about the world of this happening.

Continue reading

MH17 Beyond the Victims

Flowers for the MH17 Lost in Kiev

Flowers for the MH17 Lost in Kiev

In times of ultimate sadness and horror; the human mind becomes easily malleable to outside influences where normally structured and considered thoughts act as a bulwark.

With another Malaysian Airliner down and all aboard lost over a battlefront contested area of Ukraine; the loss of innocent international lives seems not just a crime of the airways, but one against all humanity.

The personal sadness for families this act of war has brought to the so many loved ones of the victims is incalculable and this is a story, a narrative all on its own in this event; but the who; the why and the how; this is the other story, the other narrative altogether.

It is this latter narrative which must not be lost in the fog of sorrow and emotion. I will start by saying our Ally the United States is not always trust worthy any more. Not with its words and nor with its money.

  • The Ukraine has been a NATO front line for the USA’s push against Russia for years and this is so well known it is not necessary to rehash the evidence of their doing so.
  • The right wing arm of the current Ukrainian Government is allegedly linked well to the killing of innocents in protests during the recent uprising to oust the democratically elected leader of Ukraine.
  • The world’s main stream media in many cases appeared to pull back the same bed sheets as the US propaganda machine from day one; yet there were no facts to support the rhetoric they flooded the public with.
  • Vladimir Putin upstaged the United States with the peaceful annexation of Crimea and from that date he became their anti-Christ. Russia became the enemy of Ukraine which became the true battleground for the Ukrainian peoples to spill their blood upon; but more importantly; became the cold war battle ground for the US to rush out and keep poking the quiet stalwart neighbouring bear.

Who shot down MH17 has still yet to be investigated and identified. What is known as a fact;        MH17 Path

  • It was, possible for the Rebels of east Ukraine to do so;
  • It was, possible for the Ukrainian Military to do so;
  • It was, possible for the Russians to do so, and;
  • It was possible for the United States Military to do so.

It is also clear should the Terrorists have somehow had in their possession, the equipment and skills; shooting down an International airliner full of the world’s citizens would bring upon them nothing but condemnation of the ultimate kind from the rest of the world.  The only reason this side could have shot down MH17, is by error of judgement of target.

Yes Russian military had the skill, the weaponry and the position to be able to bring down MH17. No such action would be countenanced from their command to do so.  Yet should they have done so; once again nothing but bad bad response could be forth-coming from such an action.  Russia had zero to gain and maximum loss to expect from such an action.

The United States and the Ukraine are one here.  There are so many US trained spooks and special forces wandering the landscape of local and wider areas of Ukraine and Europe today. Who are they training? What weaponry have they supplied covertly to whom within the Ukrainian forces? How many drones are in the skies and what weaponry is attached to those stealthy wings?

If a plane such as MH17 was brought down over Eastern Ukraine as has been done, and all blame was directed towards the rebels; well now we perhaps have reason for such a heinous action to occur.  Not at or by the hands of inept rebels per-se’; but by the hands of others making it appear so.  All that is needed after such an action is the assistance of an already biased media and suddenly we have exactly what we have today; “Russian backed rebels shoot down international jet full of global citizens.”

No facts; no known truths; no substance; just another global public indoctrination by a western compliant media reporting spin from desperate Politicians so furious with Vladimir Putin’s ability to shaft them with a chess player’s skill and logic. Would they use an event like the killing of 297 innocent souls as a pawn in their game to encircle the last realms’ of the Bear; a bear who still wields sharp claws?

The Syrian gas rockets fiasco; the non-existent weapons of mass destruction in Iraq; are just two contrivances most today are familiar with. United States is quick to rhetorically skewer its foes falsely, all the while holding designs to rain bombs down upon those they wish to depose and or dispose of, the moment the global public are on side.

This brutal act of mass killing in the skies over Ukraine has a culprit that is for sure; but who that culprit is has yet a long dust billowing road to traverse before such a culprit can hang from the gallows.  What is certain is; that he who cried first “Not me Not me” while their ally cried “We know it is not the Ukraine” is indicative in the first instance of a guilty conscience and such decriers need to be subjected to the harshest scrutiny and investigations.

Reported in the NY Post @1203pm 17/07/2014: The doomed aircraft had been tracked by a surface-to-air missile system right before it went down, a senior US official told CNN. The United States was working to track the rocket’s trajectory to determine its origin, the official said.

American intelligence authorities believe it unlikely that the Ukrainian government had the capacity to take down the plane. Kiev was quick to blame the tragedy on pro-Russian, anti-government rebels who have been waging a separatist war.

http://consortiumnews.com/2014/07/18/facts-needed-on-malaysian-plane-shoot-down/

It matters not for the victims of MH17 who; but those left behind and we the people can have no forgiveness for those ‘who’, who caused this crime to occur.  They are criminals of the worst kind; be it error or intent; the crime is unfathomable and unconscionable.

As a global nation though; we must first find ‘who’ those criminals are.  I for one am not pointing the finger at one, when there is perhaps good reason to be looking closer at those whom we believe are supposedly above reproach.

Brumbyy With 2Ys

 

1080 Poison the Saviour

profession 2014 (1 of 1) (2)I have written much on this in the past as the years have passed in an effort to respond to the anti-wild-dog control voices in this country Australia.

Lately that same anti-voice has tried to use the exploits of their New Zealand counterparts and the use there of, Sodium Fluoroacetate as an environmental protection tool, as being the bad guy at the table. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Much of the knowledge of this poison has come from extremely lengthy research done time and time again so as to appease the environmentalist’s concerns. Most of those concerns were wild and emotional conjecture given breath via a loud and vociferous minority who in fact were, and are, killing the wilds through misguided kindness.

This link goes to the heart of some of the latest research and the most current report available from Aotearoa – The Land of The Long White Cloud – NZ.

If you have a concern over the efficacy; the safety; the cruelty; the environmental effects along with the effectiveness of this chemical in controlling pests for the betterment of all; then this is not just a must read, but it is a must download report to disseminate.

Keep in mind; what NZ does with 1080 is far removed from what Australia does, but the goodness such a deadly naturally occurring chemical does for the very environment we all need, and wish to survive; may not be a panacea, but it has no equal by all accounts.

Brumbyy (With 2Ys)